Summary:
When was the last time you read about geography in the traditional
media? Executive Editor Adena Schutzberg reads about it quite a bit,
especially stories about local Geography Bees. The events and their
coverage reinforce old ideas about the discipline, rather than
showcasing its valuable use in today’s world.
I’m a serial news searcher. It’s my job to keep up with the news about
GIS, geospatial technology, GPS, remote sensing, location-based services
and related topics. But every now and then I break down and search the
news for articles about geography, the discipline in which I hold two
degrees.
When reading about geospatial technology news I get excited, jazzed and
thoughtful. When I read about geography news I get depressed. Outside
of a handful of analytical articles from the Atlantic Cities blog or efforts in local reporting like New Jersey Spotlight or the odd book review or interview with Jared Diamond or Simon Garfield, it’s all about Geography Bees.
It’s mid-January as I write this essay. Google News reports it found
523 articles, in the last week, about the announcement of, or the winner
of, this or that Bee. This week marks the end of the qualifying period
for school Bee events. The news stories, mostly from local papers,
profile the event (how many students, in which grades, how they studied,
what questions were hard), introduce the winner, and detail the next
step in the competition. Martians reading our local papers would assume
that geography is a game schoolchildren play, with the highest
achievement being attendance at the National Geography Bee. They’d see
geography as akin to the U.S. Super Bowl, only with far fewer sponsors
and no pay at all for the middle school-sized players.
I understand why the local paper and local schools want to highlight
their events. I applaud the paper for wanting to promote student
achievements other than those found on the football or soccer field. I
appreciate that the school cares enough about geography to participate
in the event (and has the $100 registration fee
to do so). Of course, pictures of smiling children with maps and medals
make for eye-catching online or print features. Finally, we adults are
always impressed to learn of children who know more than we do about
geography.
Sadly, though, these articles about the Geography Bees and the
children’s encyclopedic knowledge do not help highlight the important
role geography and related technical and spatial skills play in the
students’ and parents’ everyday lives. Nor does the coverage explore the
way the participants’ cities, states or territories, and country are
organized (or not) or how they work together with other
cities/states/countries (or not). Instead, the Bee reinforces geography
as mostly memorization. I know the questions are getting better, with
more of them based on map interpretation, physical geography and the
like, but too few address the role of geography in today’s world. Those
that do rarely make it into the paper.
The Geography Bee homepage includes these two resources for those planning to study for the Bee:
- “...The National Geographic Bee Ultimate Fact Book: Countries A-Z, chock-full of all the facts kids need to know to become a geography expert.”
- “Simply memorizing terms and place locations can be tedious and even boring. One solution is to make the task fun with an atlas-based scavenger game.”
Sigh.
How might the National Geographic Society get at the compelling
applications of geography? I suggest a National Geography Fair, akin to a
National Science Fair. The students could pick a current geographic
problem (local or regional, alone or in groups) explore it, offer
analysis and even suggest one or more ways to address it. I’d be happy
to be a judge and I’d be far more likely to tune in to the finals on TV
where some hip geography teacher interviewed each of the presenters.
I know this sort of teaching and learning is more complex than
memorization and that grading the projects and selecting winners would
be harder than the current tests used in the Bee. Still, project-based
learning is the “in thing”; perhaps project-based competition will be,
too? And, in the real world we do projects, not tests!
It’s not lost on me that quiz-show host Alex Trebek hosts the National
Geography Bee finals on TV. We need to rebrand geography from a category
in a quiz show to an activity that people do.
No comments:
Post a Comment